Why restating matters

Your baseline is the yardstick for every reduction you claim. If the business changes shape and the yardstick doesn't, the comparison stops meaning anything. Buy another company and your emissions jump, though nothing got worse. Sell a division and they fall, though nothing got better. Restating puts the baseline on the same footing as today, so the trend shows real change.

When to restate, and when not to

What happenedRestate?
You bought a business that existed in your baseline yearYes, add its baseline-year emissions
You sold or closed part of the businessYes, take its baseline-year emissions out
You outsourced or brought in-house an activity, such as deliveriesYes, if it moves emissions in or out of what you report
You switched to a better method or better data for a big sourceYes, recalculate the baseline the same way if you can
You found a significant mistake in the baselineYes, correct it
You grew, shrank, won or lost customersNo, that's real change
You opened a new site or bought a business that didn't exist in your baseline yearNo, its emissions are new
The government's conversion factors changedNo, each year keeps its own factors

These are the triggers in the GHG Protocol's corporate standard, which the PPN 006 technical standard says your footprint should follow. Our post on why footprints fell with the 2026 factors explains the factor point in more detail.

Set a threshold before you need one

Small changes don't need a restatement, and restating every year makes your figures look unstable. Decide in advance what counts as significant and write it in your method note. A common choice is 5% of the baseline, for one change or several small ones added together. The GHG Protocol currently leaves the figure to each company, but its working groups have been discussing a set threshold, so check for changes when you next review your plan.

A worked example

A firm reported a 42 tonne baseline for 2023. In 2025 it buys a smaller competitor, which emitted 6.5 tonnes in 2023. Its 2025 footprint, including the new business, is 44 tonnes.

  • The acquisition is 15.5% of the original baseline, above the firm's 5% threshold, so it restates.
  • Restated 2023 baseline: 42 + 6.5 = 48.5 tonnes.
  • Against the old baseline, 2025 looks like a 4.8% increase. Against the restated one, it is a 9.3% reduction.

If the acquired firm's 2023 records aren't available, estimate them from its earliest full year you can evidence, and say so. Being open about the estimate is better than leaving it out.

Changing method

Better data is a common reason to restate. Say you counted purchased goods by spend in your baseline and now have supplier figures for your biggest lines. If you can apply the new method to the baseline year too, do. If you can't, because the old data no longer exists, keep the old baseline, and explain that part of the change comes from the method rather than from real reductions. Our post on purchased goods and services covers moving from spend to supplier data.

How to explain it

  • State the restated baseline and keep the original figure visible alongside it.
  • Say what changed, when, and how big the effect was, in one or two sentences.
  • Note your significance threshold and the method you used for any estimate.
  • Keep previous plans on your website. The PPN 006 standard says it is good practice, so evaluators can follow your progress.

PPN 006 asks you to review and update your plan every year, within six months of your financial year end, reflecting changes in your organisation's structure, so a restatement fits naturally into that update. Choosing the baseline in the first place is covered in how to pick a baseline year.

How Carbon Recycling helps

Carbon Recycling keeps each year's figures with the government factors for that year, and the Carbon Reduction Plan it builds has a baseline notes section where you explain a restatement in your own words.